Mayr

(PC) Jones v. Mayr

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 28, 20222:22-cv-01890California1,513 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATHAN DESHAUN JONES, No. 2:22-cv-1890 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER R. MAYR, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Before the court are plaintiff’s complaint for screening and plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. For the reasons set forth below, this court finds plaintiff states no cognizable claims for relief and will grant plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§1914(a),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.