Mayr

(PC) Jones v. Mayr

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 28, 20222:22-cv-01890California1,513 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NATHAN DESHAUN JONES, No. 2:22-cv-1890 DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 R. MAYR, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. 18 Before the court are plaintiff’s complaint for screening and plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma 19 pauperis. Plaintiff submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. 20 §1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. For the reasons 21 set forth below, this court finds plaintiff states no cognizable claims for relief and will grant 22 plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint. 23 IN FORMA PAUPERIS 24 Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. 25 §1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. 26 Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. 27 §§1914(a),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.