German
(PC) Harris v. German
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 DEVONTE B. HARRIS, 1:15-cv-01462-ADA-GSA-PC
12 Plaintiff, AMENDED FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING
13 vs. THAT THIS CASE BE DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE BASED ON
14 GERMAN, et al., PLAINTIFF’S FALSEHOOD
15 Defendants. OBJECTIONS TO AMENDED FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS DUE WITHIN
16 FOURTEEN (14) DAYS
17
18
19 20 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 21 Devonte B. Harris (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 22 with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.) This case now proceeds with 23 Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint filed on March 14, 2016, against defendants Correctional 24 Officers (C/O) Humberto German, Philip Holguin, and R. Burnitzki (collectively, “Defendants”), 25 for use of excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment; and against defendant C/O 26 Philip Holguin for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment.1 (ECF No. 8.) 27 28 …