(PC) Miller v. Mule Creek State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 23, 20222:21-cv-01122California464 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ELIJAH LEE MILLER, No. 2:21-cv-01122 DB P 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

13 MULE CREEK STATE PRISON, 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. By order dated February 8, 2022, the court found plaintiff’s complaint failed to 18 state a cognizable claim. (ECF No. 11.) The court dismissed the complaint and granted plaintiff 19 thirty-days leave to file an amended complaint. (Id. at 10.) Plaintiff failed to file an amended 20 complaint, request an extension of time, or otherwise respond to the court’s order within thirty 21 days. On May 24, 2022, the court ordered plaintiff to file an amended complaint or show cause 22 why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court 23 orders within 30 days of the date of this order. (ECF No. 14.) A thirty-day deadline was set for 24 plaintiff to respond. (Id. at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.