(SS) Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 28, 20221:21-cv-01513California467 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

10 LARRY WAYNE SMITH, Case No. 1:21-cv-01513-SAB

11 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS

12 v. SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR

FAILURE TO FILE OPENING BRIEF

13 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (ECF No. 11) 14 Defendant.

DEADLINE: DECEMBER 2, 2022

15

16 17 On October 13, 2021, Plaintiff Larry Wayne Smith, originally proceeding pro se, filed 18 this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security 19 (“Commissioner”) denying an application for disability benefits pursuant to the Social Security 20 Act. (ECF No. 1.) On April 1, 2022, the Court issued an amended scheduling order. (ECF No. 21 11.) Pursuant to the amended scheduling order, Plaintiff’s opening brief was due 45 days after 22 the filing of the administrative record. (Id. at 2.) The administrative record was lodged on 23 September 28, 2022 (ECF No. 13); thus, Plaintiff’s opening brief was due by November 14, 24 2022. On November 14, 2022, Plaintiff filed a substitution of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.