Lester

(PS) Rogers v. Lester

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 29, 20222:22-cv-00914California1,416 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KIM EDWARD ROGERS, No. 2:22-cv-00914 TLN AC PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 KATHERINE LESTER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in pro se in this civil rights action alleging race-based stops, 18 detentions, and searches by Sacramento police. Pending before the undersigned is plaintiff’s 19 motion for an injunction preventing the destruction of evidence. ECF No. 9. For the reasons 20 explained below, the undersigned recommends that the motion be DENIED. 21 I. OVERVIEW 22 Plaintiff’s motion states: 23 Plaintiff, Kim Edward Rogers, request[s] the Court to issue an injunction to all Defendants and their agent(s) concerning the 24 destruction of any relevant documents related to this case. Plaintiff is against any destruction of documents by Defendants of any prior 25 pleadings that support Plaintiff’s claims in this action[.] 26 ECF No. 9…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.