Scott

Scott v. Adventist Health Bakersfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 29, 20221:22-cv-01334California2,329 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FLOYD SCOTT, Case No. 1:22-cv-01334-ADA-CDB

12 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER DISMISSING

WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S

13 v. COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO FILE A 14 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

ADVENTIST HEALTH BAKERSFIELD,

15 et al., (ECF No. 1)

16 Defendants. 17

18 Plaintiff Floyd Scott (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights 19 action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1 at 1). Plaintiff lists the following 20 parties as defendants (1) Adventist Health Bakersfield, (2) John Doe, (3) Kathleen L. Thomas, (4) 21 David Reed Condie, (5) Gallagher Bassett, (6) Christina Dietrich (7) Gwen Arroyo, SCLA, (8) 22 Compass Group, (9) National Union Insurance Company of Pittsburgh [sic], (10) Timothy Miller, 23 R.N. (“Defendants”). Id. at 1-2. 24 Preliminary Screening 25 Plaintiff, who is proceeding without counsel in this action, was granted status to proceed 26 in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.