Jalijali

(PC) Williams v. Jalijali

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 28, 20222:22-cv-00605California534 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LANCE E. WILLIAMS, Case No. 2:22-cv-00605-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS,

13 v. DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

REVOKE IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS MOOT,

14 JEHOSHUA JALIJALI, et al., AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

REFER CASE TO THE COURT’S ADR

15 Defendants. PROJECT 16 ECF Nos. 17, 19, & 25 17 18 Plaintiff commenced this action on April 6, 2022, while he was incarcerated at Folsom 19 State Prison. ECF No. 1. On April 28, 2022, I granted plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma 20 pauperis and found that he alleged viable Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against 21 defendants Jalijali and LaCroix and a viable First Amendment retaliation claim against Jalijali. 22 ECF No. 7. 23 Defendants subsequently filed a motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status, 24 arguing this his release from custody made his in forma pauperis status under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.