Miessek

Miessek v. Federal Government

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 29, 20221:22-cv-01021California790 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 TONNE L. MIESSEK, Case No. 1:22-cv-01021-SKO

10 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

11 v. PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO OBEY COURT

ORDER AND LOCAL RULES AND FAILURE TO

12 PROSECUTE

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT,

13 (Doc. 3) Defendant. 14 TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

15

16 17 Plaintiff Tonne L. Miessek, proceeding pro se, filed this civil action on August 15, 2022. 18 (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff also filed an application to proceed without the prepayment of fees, but the form 19 application was not complete. (See Doc. 2.) The application indicated that Plaintiff received money 20 from disability or workers compensation payments, but it did not state the amount received and 21 what Plaintiff expects to continue to receive. (See id.) It was also unclear whether Plaintiff owns 22 any real estate, stocks, bonds, securities, other financial instruments, automobiles, or any other 23 thing of value. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.