Miessek
Miessek v. Federal Government
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 TONNE L. MIESSEK, Case No. 1:22-cv-01021-SKO
10 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
11 v. PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO OBEY COURT
ORDER AND LOCAL RULES AND FAILURE TO
12 PROSECUTE
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT,
13 (Doc. 3) Defendant. 14 TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
15
16 17 Plaintiff Tonne L. Miessek, proceeding pro se, filed this civil action on August 15, 2022. 18 (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff also filed an application to proceed without the prepayment of fees, but the form 19 application was not complete. (See Doc. 2.) The application indicated that Plaintiff received money 20 from disability or workers compensation payments, but it did not state the amount received and 21 what Plaintiff expects to continue to receive. (See id.) It was also unclear whether Plaintiff owns 22 any real estate, stocks, bonds, securities, other financial instruments, automobiles, or any other 23 thing of value. …