Vasquez

(PC) Cortinas v. Vasquez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 30, 20221:19-cv-00367California463 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LARRY WILLIAM CORTINAS, No. 1:19-cv-0367 JLT SKO (PC)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS DENYING

13 v.

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

14 VASQUEZ, et al., JUDGMENT

15 Defendants. (Docs. 61, 75, 134) 16 17 Larry William Cortinas is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 18 civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants seek summary judgment, 19 asserting that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies related to his claims for 20 deliberate indifference and sexual assault. (Doc. 61.) 21 On November 7, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge found the Court “is unable to 22 determine, on the present record, whether Plaintiff has exhausted his administrative remedies as 23 to Plaintiff’s deliberate indifference and sexual assault claims.” (Doc. 134 at 22; see also id. at 24 10-22.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended Defendants’ motion for summary 25 judgment be denied. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.