Harrington

(PC) Murray v. Harrington

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 30, 20222:21-cv-01936California398 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAUL MURRAY, No. 2:21-cv-01936-EFB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 HARRINGTON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. For the third time, he moves to extend the deadline for the close of discovery and 19 for the filing of dispositive motions as established by the court’s discovery and scheduling order. 20 See ECF No. 27. Plaintiff requests another 60-day extension of time because of limitations 21 imposed by yet another modified program resulting from Covid-19 outbreak quarantine 22 procedures at his prison. Id. Defendants did not respond to plaintiff’s request. 23 Good cause appearing, plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 27) is GRANTED and the discovery 24 and scheduling order is MODIFIED as follows: 25 1. The parties may conduct discovery until March 31, 2023. Any motions necessary to 26 compel discovery shall be filed by that date. All…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.