(PC)Brown

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARK ANTHONY BROWN, No. 2:20-CV-0885-KJM-DMC-P 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 | P.LELIS, et al, 1S Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Brown has filed a request the court construes as seeking an extension of time to 18 | file objections to the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations, and also indicates he 19 | wishes to file a motion to reconsider this court’s adoption of those findings. ECF No. 42. 20 Because this court has already adopted the findings and recommendations, the request for 21 | an extension to file objections is denied as moot. 22 A motion for reconsideration or relief from a judgment 1s appropriately brought under 23 | either Rule 59(e) or Rule 60(b). Fuller v. M.G. Jewelry, 950 F.2d 1437, 1442 (9th Cir. 1991) 24 | (citing Taylor v. Knapp, 871 F.2d 803, 805 (9th Cir. 1989)). Although Brown does not identify 25 | the basis of this motion, the court construes it as a motion for relief from a judgment or…