Raymond

Raymond v. Compucom Systems, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 30, 20222:21-cv-02327California621 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 The California Labor and Workforce No. 2:21-cv-02327-KJM-KJN Development Agency, et al., 12 ORDER B Plaintiffs, 14 v: 15 Compucom Systems, Inc., 16 Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiff William Raymond brings this employment action on his own behalf and under 19 | the California Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). Defendant CompuCom Systems, Inc. 20 | moves to compel arbitration of all claims except the PAGA claim. See Mot. Compel, ECF No. 7. 21 | This court held its motion in abeyance pending a determination on whether Raymond assented to 22 | the arbitration agreement. Prior Order, ECF No. 20. The court set a bench trial in February 2023 23 | to resolve that dispute of fact. See Min. Order (Sept. 1, 2022), ECF No. 25. 24 CompuCom now moves for summary judgment, arguing there is no genuine dispute that 25 | an arbitration agreement formed between itself and Raymond. Mot. Summ. J., ECF No. 28. In 26 | …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.