(PC) Gaskins v. Mule Creek State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 30, 20222:22-cv-00459California924 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JOSEPH GASKINS, Case No. 2:22-cv-00459-JDP (PC) 11 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: 12 v. (1) STAND BY HIS COMPLAINT

SUBJECT TO A

13 MULE CREEK STATE PRISON, RECOMMENDATION OF

DISMISSAL; OR

14 Defendant. (2) FILE AN AMENDED 15 COMPLAINT 16 ECF No. 18 17 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 18 19 20 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, alleges in his first amended complaint that he was transferred 21 from Mule Creek State Prison to Coalinga State Hospital without his personal property. ECF No. 22 18 at 3. As in his initial complaint, he does not name any individual responsible for this 23 deprivation and names only Mule Creek State Prison as a defendant. He has not made out a 24 cognizable claim. I will give plaintiff one final opportunity to amend his complaint before 25 recommending that this action be dismissed. 26 Screening and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.