Pfeiffer

(PC) Muniz v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20221:19-cv-00233California376 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2

3

4

5

6

7

8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 CELINA MUNIZ, et al., CASE NO. 1:19-CV-00233-JLT-CDB

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER SEALING DOCUMENTS AS SET

FORTH IN THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION

13 v.

14 C. PFEIFFER, et al., Doc. 86

15 Defendants. 16 17 Pursuant to Local Rule 141(b) and based upon the representations contained in the parties’ 18 stipulated request to seal, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Exhibits A, B, C, and D as designated by 19 counsel for the Plaintiffs in support of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary 20 Judgment, shall be SEALED until further order of this Court. (Doc. 86, p. 2). 21 It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ unredacted Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for 22 Summary Judgment as well as the unredacted Response to Defendants’ statement of facts (“the 23 unredacted motions”) be SEALED until further order of this Court. 24 The Court has considered the factors set forth in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.