Komar

Project Sentinel v. Komar

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 30, 20221:19-cv-00708California4,350 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 PROJECT SENTINEL, Case No. 1:19-cv-00708-ADA-EPG 14 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S v. RENEWED MOTION FOR ASSIGNMENT 16 ORDER AND ORDER RESTRAINING

JEANETTE KOMAR, DEBTOR BE GRANTED

17 Defendant. (ECF No. 115). 18

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN FOURTEEN

19 (14) DAYS 20 21 22 Plaintiff Project Sentinel (“Plaintiff”) is a judgment creditor, having previously obtained a 23 default judgment award against Defendant Jeanette Komar (“Ms. Komar”). Before the Court is 24 Plaintiff’s renewed motion for an assignment order and an order restraining judgment debtor. 25 (ECF No. 115). The matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 US.C. § 636 and Local 26 Rule 302. For the following reasons, the Court will recommend that the motion be granted. 27 // 28 1 I. BACKGROUND 2 The Court refers to its prior findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.