West

(PC) Arteaga v. West

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20222:20-cv-00752California2,954 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE O. ARTEAGA, Case No. 2:20-cv-00752-WBS-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING THE JULY 26, 2022

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

N. WEST, et al., THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO AMEND

THE COMPLAINT AND TO SET ASIDE

Defendants. VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL BE DENIED ECF Nos. 31, 32, & 40 17 I previously screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). ECF No. 16. I notified plaintiff that the amended complaint stated cognizable Eighth Amendment claims against defendants West and John Doe #1, but that all other claims were insufficiently pled. Id. I granted plaintiff thirty days to advise the court whether he intended to stand on his complaint, file an amended complaint, or proceed on the amended complaint’s cognizable claims, voluntarily dismissing his other claims. Id. After plaintiff notified the court that he wanted to proceed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.