Warden
(HC) Menendez v. Warden
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JUAN PEYTON MENENDEZ, Case No. 2:22-cv-00047-JDP (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
13 v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE
TO STATE A CLAIM
14 WARDEN, ECF No. 14 15 Respondent.
RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
16 DAYS 17 18 19 On April 12, 2022, I screened petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, notified him 20 that it was likely time-barred, and granted him thirty days to file an amended petition. 21 ECF No. 5. Petitioner subsequently requested three extensions of time to file an amended 22 petition, all of which the court granted. See ECF Nos. 6, 7, 10, 12, 13, & 14. The last extension 23 of time granted petitioner until October 30, 2022, to file an amended petition. ECF No. 14. To 24 date, petitioner has not filed an amended petition. 25 To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines and requires litigants to 26 meet those deadlines. The…