Warden

(HC) Menendez v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20222:22-cv-00047California454 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JUAN PEYTON MENENDEZ, Case No. 2:22-cv-00047-JDP (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

13 v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO STATE A CLAIM

14 WARDEN, ECF No. 14 15 Respondent.

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

16 DAYS 17 18 19 On April 12, 2022, I screened petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, notified him 20 that it was likely time-barred, and granted him thirty days to file an amended petition. 21 ECF No. 5. Petitioner subsequently requested three extensions of time to file an amended 22 petition, all of which the court granted. See ECF Nos. 6, 7, 10, 12, 13, & 14. The last extension 23 of time granted petitioner until October 30, 2022, to file an amended petition. ECF No. 14. To 24 date, petitioner has not filed an amended petition. 25 To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines and requires litigants to 26 meet those deadlines. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.