Eaton

1

2

3 4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 DILLON EDWARD ALCALA, 1:21-cv-00592-GSA-PC 12

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

13 Plaintiff, CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO

14 vs. EXHAUST ADMINISTRATIVE

REMEDIES

15 EATON, et al., (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) 16 Defendants. 30 DAY DEADLINE TO RESPOND 17

18

19

20

21 22 Dillon Edward Alcala (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 23 forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 8, 2021, 24 Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On April 29, 2021, Plaintiff 25 filed the First Amended Complaint as a matter of course, which is now before the Court for 26 screening. (ECF No. 8.) 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. 27 In his Complaint and First Amended Complaint, Plaintiff indicates that he did not 28 complete the exhaustion process at Sierra Conservation Center. In the Complaint Plaintiff asserts 1 that “[t]here was no suitable remedy to this situation because I was already exposed to the [Covid] 2 …