CDCR

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 EARL DEAN CHRISTIAN, JR., 2:21-cv-00305-KJN 13 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 14 DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR v. EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 15 PRE-ANSWER MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

16 H. MACIAS, et al., (EXHAUSTION) 17 Defendants.

18 19 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding through counsel. On November 23, 2022, 20 defendants filed a motion for extension of time to file their motion for summary judgment on 21 exhaustion grounds. Plaintiff does not oppose the extension. 22 “The district court is given broad discretion in supervising the pretrial phase of litigation.” 23 Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992) (citation and internal 24 quotation marks omitted). Rule 16(b) provides that “[a] schedule may be modified only for good 25 cause and with the judge’s consent.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). “The schedule may…