Xiong

Cleveland v. Xiong

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20221:22-cv-01366California1,311 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TIMOTHY CLEVELAND, Case No. 1:22-cv-01366-ADA-BAM 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL WITHOUT

13 v. PREJUDICE (Doc. 7) 14 BLONG XIONG, et al., ORDER DENYING IN FORMA PAUPERIS

APPLICATION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

15 Defendants. (Docs. 1, 7) 16 ORDER REQUING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

LONG FORM APPLICATION TO PROCEED

17 IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR PAY FILING FEE

WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS

18 19 Plaintiff Timothy Cleveland, proceeding pro se, filed this action in the United States 20 District Court, District of Nevada, on October 20, 2022. (Doc. 5.) The matter was transferred to 21 this Court on October 25, 2022. (Doc. 4.) Upon initiation of this action, Plaintiff did not pay the 22 $402.00 filing fee for this action and instead submitted an application to proceed in forma 23 pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 1.) 24 On November 2, 2022, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.