Xiong
Cleveland v. Xiong
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TIMOTHY CLEVELAND, Case No. 1:22-cv-01366-ADA-BAM 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR
APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL WITHOUT
13 v. PREJUDICE (Doc. 7) 14 BLONG XIONG, et al., ORDER DENYING IN FORMA PAUPERIS
APPLICATION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
15 Defendants. (Docs. 1, 7) 16 ORDER REQUING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
LONG FORM APPLICATION TO PROCEED
17 IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR PAY FILING FEE
WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS
18 19 Plaintiff Timothy Cleveland, proceeding pro se, filed this action in the United States 20 District Court, District of Nevada, on October 20, 2022. (Doc. 5.) The matter was transferred to 21 this Court on October 25, 2022. (Doc. 4.) Upon initiation of this action, Plaintiff did not pay the 22 $402.00 filing fee for this action and instead submitted an application to proceed in forma 23 pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 1.) 24 On November 2, 2022, the…