Bridges

Bridges v. PacifiCorp

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20222:22-cv-01698California2,768 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Beverly U. Bridges, et al., No. 2:22-cv-01698-KJM-KJN Plaintiffs, ORDER V. PacifiCorp & Richard Harris, 1S Defendants. 16 This case arises from the destruction of properties caused by the McKinney Fire in the summer of 2022. Defendant PacifiCorp removed the case to federal court, asserting diversity 19 jurisdiction and fraudulent joinder. Before the court is plaintiffs’ motion to remand. For the 20 reasons below, the court grants the motion. I. BACKGROUND On July 29, 2022, the McKinney Fire spread through Siskiyou County, damaging 23 plaintiffs’ real and personal property. Ex. C, First Am. Compl. (FAC) 9] 16, 22, ECF No. 1-3. On August 16, 2022, plaintiffs filed a complaint against PacifiCorp and Doe defendants. See Ex. A, Compl., ECF No. 1-1. Plaintiffs later added Richard Harris as a defendant in their first amended complaint. FAC § 12.

Harris works for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.