Tate
(PC) Franklin v. Tate
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10
11 JEFFREY FRANKLIN, ) Case No. 1:19-cv-01170-AWI-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 13 v. ) RELIEF FROM THE JUDGMENT
) 14 HAROLD TATE, et al., (Doc. No. 44) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 )
17 Plaintiff Jeffrey Franklin is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 18 1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for relief from the Court’s final judgment, filed 20 August 15, 2022. Defendant filed an opposition on August 29, 2022. (ECF No. 45.) 21 22 DISCUSSION 23 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) governs the reconsideration of final orders of the 24 district court. Rule 60(b) permits a district court to relieve a party from a final order or judgment on 25 grounds of: “(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence 26 ...; (3) fraud ... of an adverse party; (4) the…