Trate

(HC) Mickling v. Trate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20221:22-cv-00010California1,822 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 MAURICE A. MICKLING, Case No. 1:22-cv-00010-SKO (HC)

12 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING

13 v. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS

14 [Doc. 17] 15 B.M. TRATE, Warden,

16 Respondent.

17 18 Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. He is currently in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) 20 at the United States Penitentiary in Atwater, California. All parties having consented to the 21 jurisdiction of the magistrate judge, on November 8, 2022, the Court issued an order reassigning 22 the case to the undersigned for all purposes, including entry of final judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 23 636(c). 24 Petitioner challenges seven (7) separate disciplinary hearings in which he was found 25 guilty of violating various BOP Codes. He claims that for each disciplinary proceeding, the BOP 26 failed to issue a statement of reasons for the guilty finding, and the BOP failed to serve the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.