(HC) Roberson v. People of the State of CA
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARLON ROBERTSON, No. 2:22-cv-01557-JDP (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
13 v. FAILURE PAY THE FILING FEE, FAILURE
TO PROSECUTE, AND FAILURE TO
14 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 ECF No. 4 Respondents. 16 RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
DAYS
17 18 On October 19, 2022, the court ordered petitioner to submit, within thirty days, either the 19 $5 filing fee or an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.1 ECF No. 4. To date, 20 petitioner has not complied with that order. 21 To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires 22 litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for petitioner’s failure to 23 prosecute or failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells 24 Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest…