Deems

(PC) Mills v. Deems

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20222:22-cv-01738California1,276 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RODNEY JAMES MILLS, Case No. 2:22-cv-01738-TLN-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

13 v. PAUPERIS 14 MICHAEL R. DEEMS, et al., ECF No. 10 15 Defendants. SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: 16 (1) FILE AN AMENDED

COMPLAINT; OR

17 (2) STAND BY HIS COMPLAINT 18 SUBJECT TO A

RECOMMENDATION THAT IT BE

19 DISMISSED 20 ECF No. 1 21 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 22 23 Plaintiff Rodney James is a pretrial detainee proceeding without counsel in this civil rights 24 action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleges that defendant Judge Michael Deems and 25 Deputy District Attorney Michael Tufaro violated his constitutional rights by denying him bail 26 and failing to release him from custody. These claims are not cognizable as alleged. I will give 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.