Samra

Gilbert v. Samra

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20221:22-cv-00552California4,579 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DARREN GILBERT, Case No. 1:22-cv-00552-ADA-BAM 12 Plaintiff,

ORDER VACATING DECEMBER 9, 2022

13 v. HEARING 14 HARKIRAT SINGH SAMRA dba BILL’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SPORT & BAIT SHOP, et al., REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 15 DEFAULT JUDGMENT (Doc. 19) Defendants. 16 FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 17 18 On October 24, 2022, Plaintiff Darren Gilbert (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion for default 19 judgment against Defendants Harkirat Singh Samra dba Bill’s Sport & Bait Shop (“Defendant 20 Samra”) and Fahmi Abdo Alsumeri (“Defendant Alsumeri”) (collectively, “Defendants”). (Doc. 21 19.) No opposition was filed. The motion was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 22 § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The Court finds the matter suitable for decision without oral 23 argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), and the hearing set for December 9, 2022, is HEREBY 24

VACATED.

25 Having considered the moving…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.