(SS) Marinoble v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20222:22-cv-00209California3,272 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULIA MARIE MARINOBLE, No. 2:22-cv-00209 CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER & KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying an application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (“Act”). For the reasons discussed below, the undersigned Magistrate Judge will recommend that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be granted and the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment be denied. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, born in 1993, applied on May 16, 2019 for SSI, alleging disability beginning February 3, 1993. Administrative Transcript (“AT”) 15, 22, 175-80. Plaintiff alleged she was unable to work due to emotional, mental and learning problems. AT 201. In a decision dated 27 28 February 24, 2021, the ALJ determined that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.