(SS) Marinoble v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20222:22-cv-00209California3,272 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JULIA MARIE MARINOBLE, No. 2:22-cv-00209 CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER & 14 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16

17 18 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security 19 (“Commissioner”) denying an application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title 20 XVI of the Social Security Act (“Act”). For the reasons discussed below, the undersigned 21 Magistrate Judge will recommend that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be granted and 22 the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment be denied. 23 BACKGROUND 24 Plaintiff, born in 1993, applied on May 16, 2019 for SSI, alleging disability beginning 25 February 3, 1993. Administrative Transcript (“AT”) 15, 22, 175-80. Plaintiff alleged she was 26 unable to work due to emotional, mental and learning problems. AT 201. In a decision dated 27 28 1 February 24, 2021, the ALJ determined that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.