(SS)Orozco

(SS)Orozco v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20221:22-cv-01478California747 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 LUZ MARIA OROZCO, Case No. 1:22-cv-01478-CDB (SS) 12 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND

13 v. DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ISSUE

SUMMONS, SCHEDULING ORDER, AND

14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR

REASSIGNMENT DOCUMENTS

15 Respondent. (ECF No. 4) 16 17 18 Petitioner Luz Maria Orozco (“Petitioner”) seeks judicial review of an administrative 19 decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Petitioner’s claim for disability 20 benefits under the Social Security Act. (ECF No. 1). On November 16, 2022, Petitioner filed a 21 motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF No. 2). On November 23, 2022, the Court 22 issued a screening order dismissing Petitioner’s complaint and denying petitioner’s motion to 23 proceed IFP as the complaint did not specify the date an extension to the Appeals Council was 24 requested and what good cause, if any, Petitioner had in delaying her filing of this civil action. 25 (ECF No. 3 at 4). That…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.