Hall

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TORREY HALL, No. 2:22-cv-00937-DAD-DB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER 14 TARGET CORPORATION, 15 Defendant. 16 17 On June 1, 2022, the previously assigned district judge issued an initial pretrial scheduling 18 order in this case. (Doc. No. 3). On August 25, 2022, this case was reassigned to the 19 undersigned, and that reassignment order provided that “[a]ll dates currently set in this reassigned 20 action shall remain pending subject to further order of the court.” (Doc. No. 4.) On December 1, 21 2022, the parties filed a joint stipulation to extend certain discovery deadlines. (Doc. No. 6.) 22 Having considered the parties’ stipulation, and consistent with the undersigned’s scheduling 23 practices, the court hereby issues this amended scheduling order. 24 I. SERVICE OF PROCESS 25 The named defendant has been served as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5. 26 No further service is permitted without leave of court, good cause…