(PC)Jordan
(PC)Jordan v. Arcee
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10 NOLAN JORDAN, Case No. 1:20-cv-01658-ADA-SAB (PC)
11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMEDATIONS
REGARDING DEFENDANT’S
12 v. EXHAUSTION MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
13 ARCE, et al., FOR DISCOVERY
14 Defendants. (ECF Nos. 38, 41)
15 16 Plaintiff Nolan Jordan is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 17 action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 Currently before the Court is Defendant Arce’s exhaustion motion for summary 19 judgment, filed January 12, 2022. 20 I. 21 PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 22 This action is proceeding against Defendant Arce1 and three unidentified ICC members 23 for deliberate indifference to Plaintiff’s safety in violation of the Eighth Amendment.2 24 Defendant Arce filed an answer on August 5, 2021. 25 On October 7, 2021, Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe conducted a settlement 26 conference, but the case did not settle.