Palacios
(PC) Arevalo v. Palacios
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CESAR AREVALO, Case No. 2:22-cv-00774-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
13 v. PAUPERIS 14 PALACIOS, et al., ECF No. 2 15 Defendants. SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: 16 (1) FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT; OR 17 (2) STAND BY HIS COMPLAINT 18 SUBJECT TO A RECOMMENDATION
THAT IT BE DISMISSED
19 ECF No. 1 20
THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
21
22 23 Plaintiff Cesar Arevalo is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights 24 action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleges that defendant prison officials violated his 25 Eighth Amendment rights by failing to protect him against an attack and, afterwards, by delaying 26 his access to medical attention. ECF No. 1. I find that plaintiff has not stated cognizable claims. 27 28 1 I will give him an opportunity to amend his complaint before recommending that it be…