Covello

(PC) Rodriguez v. Covello

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20222:22-cv-00602California1,022 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 BRIAN MICHAEL RODRIGUEZ, Case No. 2:22-cv-00602-JDP (PC) 11 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: 12 v. (1) STAND BY HIS COMPLAINT

SUBJECT TO A

13 PATRICK COVELLO, et al., RECOMMENDATION OF

DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AND

14 Defendants. PARTIES, OR 15 (2) FILE A SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

16 ECF No. 17 17

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

18

19 20 21 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, raises at least three separate and unrelated claims against 22 multiple defendants. These claims, described below, cannot proceed jointly; I will give plaintiff 23 an opportunity to amend his complaint so that it includes only related claims. If he declines to 24 file an amended complaint, I will screen his first viable claim through and recommend that other 25 unrelated parties and claims be dismissed. 26 27 28 1 Screening Order 2 I. Screening and Pleading Requirements 3 A federal court must screen a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.