(PS) Selck v. Mikuni Restaurants

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MORREY SELCK, No. 2:22–cv–2141–KJM–KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 13 v. 14 MIKUNI RESTAURANTS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding without counsel in this action, filed a complaint against 18 defendants Mikuni Restaurants, California Bank and Trust, First Japanese Baptist Church, Kokio 19 Arai, Taro Arai, Helen Okumura, Carmalita Cruz, and John Meyer.1 (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff paid 20 the filing fee and the Clerk issued subpoenas for plaintiff to serve defendants. (ECF No. 2.) 21 Upon review of plaintiff’s complaint, the court notes it fails to state a cause of action that 22 implicates the court’s federal subject matter jurisdiction. Therefore, plaintiff is hereby ordered to 23 show cause why this case should not be dismissed. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 1 Actions where a party proceeds without counsel are referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 E.D. Cal. L.R. 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. 1 …