Thompson

(HC) Santos v. Thompson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20222:21-cv-01768California566 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 HUGO SANTOS, No. 2:21-cv-1768 TLN DB P 11 Petitioner, 12 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 PAUL THOMPSON, et al., 14 Respondents. 15 16 Petitioner has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 17 2241. Petitioner has paid the filing fee. Petitioner seeks relief under the First Step Act (“FSA”) 18 of 2018.1 For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will recommend that this action be 19 dismissed. 20 Petitioner commenced this action by filing the petition. (ECF No. 1.) Therein, he argued 21 that the Federal Bureau of Prisons violated his rights by failing to establish a mechanism for 22 awarding credits under the First Step Act. (Id.) By order dated February 17, 2022, the 23 government was directed to file a response to the petition. (ECF No. 6.) The government filed a 24 response and motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 8.) Petitioner did not file an opposition, statement of 25 //// 26

27 1 The First Step Act…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.