Novotech (Australia) PTY Limited v. SureClinical, Inc.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 NOVOTECH (AUSTRALIA) PTY No. 2:22-cv-01259-JAM-AC LIMITED, an Australian 12 proprietary limited company,

13 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF

NOVOTECH (AUSTRALIA) PTY

14 v. LIMITED’S MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

15 SURECLINICAL INC., a Nevada corporation, 16 Defendant. 17

18 The matter before the Court is Novotech (Australia) Pty

19 Limited’s (“Novotech”) motion for preliminary injunction. See

20 Mot. for Preliminary Inj. (“Mot.”), ECF No. 18. SureClinical

21 Inc.’s (“SureClinical”) opposed the motion. See Opp’n, ECF

22 No. 19. Novotech replied. See Reply, ECF No. 21.1

23 I. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

24 As the facts are already known to the parties, the Court

25 repeats them only as necessary to explain its decision. 26

27 1 This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearing was scheduled 28 for November 1, 2022. 1 Novotech is a…