Novotech (Australia) PTY Limited v. SureClinical, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20222:22-cv-01259California4,601 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOVOTECH (AUSTRALIA) PTY No. 2:22-cv-01259-JAM-AC LIMITED, an Australian proprietary limited company,

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF

NOVOTECH (AUSTRALIA) PTY

v. LIMITED’S MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

SURECLINICAL INC., a Nevada corporation, 16 Defendant.

The matter before the Court is Novotech (Australia) Pty

Limited’s (“Novotech”) motion for preliminary injunction. See

Mot. for Preliminary Inj. (“Mot.”), ECF No. 18. SureClinical

Inc.’s (“SureClinical”) opposed the motion. See Opp’n, ECF

No. 19. Novotech replied. See Reply, ECF No. 21.

I. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

As the facts are already known to the parties, the Court

repeats them only as necessary to explain its decision.

1 This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearing was scheduled for November 1, 2022. Novotech is a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.