Zaragoza
(PC) Williams v. Zaragoza
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LANCE WILLIAMS, No. 2:21-cv-0153 TLN AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 L. ZARAGOZA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 18 1983 and has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. See 19 ECF No. 2. The matter has been referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 20 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The undersigned previously issued Findings and 21 Recommendations (“F&Rs”) regarding plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF 22 No. 10. Plaintiff has filed objections to the F&Rs. ECF No. 11. 23 For the reasons stated below, the court will vacate the outstanding F&Rs. In addition, 24 plaintiff will be directed to fill out and return a non-prisoner in forma pauperis application. 25 I. RELEVANT HISTORY 26 When plaintiff filed his IFP application in January 2021, he was incarcerated at…