Pratti
(PC) Anglin v. Pratti
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAYMOND ANGLIN, Case No. 1:19-cv-01334-JLT-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE 13 v. (Doc. 74 and 78) 14 M. PRATTI, et al.,
15 Defendants. 16 17 The parties submitted several motions in limine regarding evidence expected to be 18 presented at trial (Doc. 74; Doc. 78.) The Court finds the matters suitable for decision without 19 oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) and General Order 618. 20 I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 21 This case involves Mr. Anglin’s Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Resendez, 22 Cavazos, Amaya, Villalobos, Guerrero, and Gomez for excessive force and against Defendants 23 Wilburn and Duran for failure to intervene. (Doc. 81 at 1.) Mr. Anglin is a state prisoner at the 24 California Correctional Institution (CCI) in Tehachapi, California, and proceeding pro se. (Id. at 25 1, 3.) His claims arise from an incident that occurred on January 9, 2019, the circumstances of 26 which are largely disputed. (Id. at 7.) According to…