(PC) Villery v. California Department of Corrections

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20221:15-cv-00987California1,652 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JARED M. VILLERY, Case No. 1:15-cv-00987-ADA-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF

13 v.

ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE

14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO OBEY CORRECTIONS, et al., COURT ORDER 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 180) 16

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

17 18 19 Plaintiff Jared M. Villery (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 20 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against 21 Defendants Kendall, Acosta, Jones, Guerrero, Woodward,1 and Grimmig for deliberate 22 indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment, and against Defendant Allison2 for 23 promulgation of a policy to deny single cell housing for inmates with serious mental disorders in 24 violation of the Eighth Amendment. Plaintiff’s claims arise out of allegations that he developed 25

1 Erroneously sued as “Woodard.” 26

2 Effective October 1, 2020, Secretary Allison…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.