D'Agostini

(PC) Shropshire v. D'Agostini

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20222:21-cv-00466California356 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RYAN NEIL SHROPSHIRE, No. 2:21-cv-0466 WBS DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 JOHN D’AGOSTINI, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a former1 county jail inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims he received inadequate dental care while 19 incarcerated in El Dorado County. 20 On October 6, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties, and which contained notice to all parties that any objection to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. (ECF No. 31.) Neither 23 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

24 1 Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address dated October 26, 2021, stating his new address and 25 indicating that his release from custody was imminent. (ECF No. 15.) Review of the El Dorado County inmate locator website indicates that plaintiff is no longer in custody. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.