Cissna
(PS) Van den Heuvel v. Cissna
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Jean Mare Van den Heuvel, No. 2:21-cv-01342-KJM-CKD 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 Teri Cissna, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 In July 2022, this court adopted the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations, 18 | dismissing plaintiff Jean Marc Van den Heuvel’s action against three Sheriffs officers. Prior 19 | Order (Oct. 27, 2022), ECF No. 15. In October 2022, Van den Heuvel filed a document including 20 | a vague statement about alleged wrongful acts by officers. See Not., ECF No. 44. The following 21 | month he filed a second document, including further vague statements about alleged wrongful 22 | acts by officers. See Letter, ECF No. 45. This court liberally construes the filings as motions to 23 | reconsider the prior order. 24 While a court may relieve a party from an order under Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of 25 | Civil Procedure for “mistake, inadvertence, fraud, or excusable neglect” or for “any other…