Novotech (Australia) PTY Limited v. SureClinical, Inc.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 NOVOTECH (AUSTRALIA) PTY No. 2:22-cv-01259-JAM-AC LIMITED, an Australian 12 proprietary limited company,

13 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

SURECLINICAL INC.’S MOTIONS

14 v. FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND

TO STAY

15 SURECLINICAL INC., a Nevada corporation, 16 Defendant. 17

18 The matter before the Court is SureClinical Inc.’s

19 (“SureClinical”) motions for preliminary injunction and to stay

20 proceedings. See Mot. for Preliminary Inj. and to Stay (“Mot.”),

21 ECF No. 13. Novotech (Australia) Pty Limited (“Novotech”)

22 opposed the motions. See Opp’n, ECF No. 15. SureClinical

23 replied. See Reply, ECF No. 17.

24 For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS

25 SureClinical’s motions.1 26

27 1 This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearing was scheduled 28 for November 1, 2022. 1 I. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

2 SureClinical…