Novotech (Australia) PTY Limited v. SureClinical, Inc.
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20222:22-cv-01259California4,086 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
NOVOTECH (AUSTRALIA) PTY No. 2:22-cv-01259-JAM-AC LIMITED, an Australian proprietary limited company,
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
SURECLINICAL INC.’S MOTIONS
v. FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND
TO STAY
SURECLINICAL INC., a Nevada corporation, 16 Defendant.
The matter before the Court is SureClinical Inc.’s
(“SureClinical”) motions for preliminary injunction and to stay
proceedings. See Mot. for Preliminary Inj. and to Stay (“Mot.”),
ECF No. 13. Novotech (Australia) Pty Limited (“Novotech”)
opposed the motions. See Opp’n, ECF No. 15. SureClinical
replied. See Reply, ECF No. 17.
For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS
SureClinical’s motions.1
1 This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearing was scheduled for November 1, 2022. I. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND