Novotech (Australia) PTY Limited v. SureClinical, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20222:22-cv-01259California4,086 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NOVOTECH (AUSTRALIA) PTY No. 2:22-cv-01259-JAM-AC LIMITED, an Australian proprietary limited company,

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

SURECLINICAL INC.’S MOTIONS

v. FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND

TO STAY

SURECLINICAL INC., a Nevada corporation, 16 Defendant.

The matter before the Court is SureClinical Inc.’s

(“SureClinical”) motions for preliminary injunction and to stay

proceedings. See Mot. for Preliminary Inj. and to Stay (“Mot.”),

ECF No. 13. Novotech (Australia) Pty Limited (“Novotech”)

opposed the motions. See Opp’n, ECF No. 15. SureClinical

replied. See Reply, ECF No. 17.

For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS

SureClinical’s motions.1

1 This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearing was scheduled for November 1, 2022. I. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

SureClinical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.