(PC) Mundy v. Sacramento County Jail Medical Staff

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20221:22-cv-00401California789 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

10 STANLEY W. MUNDY, Case No. 1:22-cv-00401-ADA-SAB (PC)

11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

12 v. INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

13 SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL (ECF No. 25) STAFF, et al., 14 Defendants. 15

16 17 Plaintiff Stanley A. Mundy is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for an injunction and/or temporary 20 restraining order, filed December 2, 2022. 21 I. 22 DISCUSSION 23 “A preliminary injunction is an extraordinary remedy never awarded as of right.” Winter 24 v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008) (citation omitted). “A plaintiff seeking a 25 preliminary injunction must establish that he is likely to succeed on the merits, that he is likely to 26 suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, that the balance of equities tips in his 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.