(PC) Holston v. Viera Rosa

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 6, 20222:20-cv-01076California804 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THERON KENNETH HOLSTON, No. 2:20-cv-1076 KJM CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 G. VIERA ROSA, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 19 by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On August 11, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. F&R., ECF No. 116. 23 Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Obj., ECF No. 117. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the 26 findings and recommendations to be supported by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.