Ciolli

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIE DWAYNE CLARK, Case No. 1:21-cv-01081-SKO (PC)

12 Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

13 v. TO DISMISS THE ACTION FOR FAILURE

TO STATE A COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR

14 ANDREW CIOLLI, et al., RELIEF

15 Defendants. Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge

16

17 Plaintiff Willie Dwayne Clark is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 18 action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of 19 Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s 20 complaint filed on July 12, 2021. 21 I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT 22 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 23 governmental entity and/or against an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 24 1915A(a). Plaintiff's complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous or 25 malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon…