(SS) Crunk v. Commissioner of Social Security

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GEATANA BERENDA ANN CRUNK, Case No. 1:22-cv-00353-HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’

STIPULATED MOTION TO REMAND

13 v. UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), REVERSING FINAL DECISION AND 14 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING REMANDING CASE1

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

15 SECURITY, (Doc. No. 15) 16 Defendant. ORDER MOOTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

17 (Doc. No. 12) 18 19 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to remand filed December 5, 2022. 20 (Doc. No. 15). Plaintiff Geatana Berenda Ann Crunk and the Commissioner of Social Security 21 agree that this case should be remanded for further administrative proceedings under sentence 22 four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Id.). 23 The United States Supreme Court held that the Social Security Act permits remand in 24 conjunction with a judgment either affirming, reversing, or modifying the Secretary’s decision. 25 See Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S.…