Bateman

Bateman v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20221:19-cv-00869California206 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 | JACQUELINE BATEMAN, Case No. 1:19-cv-00869-ADA-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE

12 V. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) 13 | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL

PROCEDURE

14 Defendant. (ECF No. 56) 15 16 On December 5, 2022, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and 17 | with each party to bear its own costs and fees. (ECF No. 56.) In light of the stipulation of the 18 | parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San 19 | Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an 20 | award of costs or attorneys’ fees. 21 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 22 | case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule (a). 23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.