Smart

Primerica Life Ins. Co. v. Smart

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20222:21-cv-00422California329 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PRIMERICA LIFE INSURANCE No. 2:21-cv-00422 KJM-AC

COMPANY,

12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14

PERRY L. SMART; WANDA CLARK;

15 and MORGAN JONES FUNERAL

HOMES, INC.,

16 ORDER Defendants. 17

18

PERRY L. SMART,

19 Cross-Claimant, 20 v. 21 WANDA CLARK and MORGAN JONES 22 FUNERAL HOMES, INC., 23 Cross- Defendants. 24

25 26 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a 27 United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21). 28 1 On September 30, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 2 || were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 3 || findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 45. Neither 4 || party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 5 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 6 || 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.