Martini
(PC) Hill v. Martini
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CYMEYON HILL, No. 2:22-cv-1603 KJM AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 MARTINI, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a civil detainee proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 19 by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 19, 2022, the magistrate judge 20 filed findings and recommendations recommending the court deny plaintiff’s application to 21 proceed in forma pauperis and direct plaintiff to pay the filing fee of $402.00 for this action 22 within fourteen days. F&R, ECF No. 11. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and 23 recommendations. ECF No. 12. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) 24 and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. 25 The magistrate judge’s recommendation was based on the fact that plaintiff had a balance 26 of…