(PC) Alvarez v. Amador County Superior Court

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BLACKIE FLORINCEO ALVAREZ, SR., No. 2:21-cv-01976-DAD-CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 AMADOR COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local 19 Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Currently pending before the court is plaintiff’s first 20 amended complaint. 21 I. Factual and Procedural History 22 On February 11, 2022, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint and concluded that it 23 contained too many vague and conclusory allegations to determine whether it stated any 24 cognizable claims for relief. ECF No. 29. The court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint, but granted 25 him leave to amend. ECF No. 29. The screening order provided plaintiff with the relevant legal 26 standards that appeared to apply to his allegations and cautioned him that unrelated…