(PC) Bradford v. De Franco

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, No. 2:21-CV-2169-KJM-DMC-P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 JEREMY De FRANCO, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983. The matter was referred to a magistrate judge as provided by Eastern District of 19 California local rules. On February 14, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and 20 recommendations recommending plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be 21 denied and that this action be dismissed without prejudice to refiling upon pre-payment of the 22 filing fee for this action. See F. & R., ECF No. 9. Plaintiff objected to the findings and 23 recommendations. See Obj., ECF No. 10. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 24 § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. For 25 the reasons below, the findings and recommendations are not adopted. 26 Section 1915(a)(1) of Title…